“We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. This disposition makes unnecessary any discussion whether such segregation also violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka<\/em>, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Yes, “in the field of public education, the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place”. But today, especially in public education, we are seeing a rise in segregated education, and along with it, a clear attack on the values so clearly espoused by the Brown<\/em> Court.<\/p>\n While race was the basis for the Brown<\/em> decision, race is, as arguably IQ is, just a matter of a few genes. But it is, in a very real sense, a fiction. It is a fiction that was broadly employed in our country (and some argue its use is now rising again, see The Resegregation of Jefferson County<\/a> and Better Use of Information Could Help Agencies Identify Disparities and Address Racial Discrimination<\/a>) to maintain what were argued variously as “cultural” or “ability” differences. It was fairly common to allege that as some races were less amenable to education (slower?) they did better in their own schools, with their own kind.<\/p>\n It was this kind of thinking that was found unacceptable as to race, and then, in a striking pa In that light, of course, tracking should raise a number of concerns. While tracking may be a very effective tool for pedagogy, it can easily become a very effective tool to promote social segregation<\/a> (and has done just that). Charter schools are being created specifically to keep the “wrong child” elsewhere, and how “Native” charter schools could survive a Brown<\/em> challenge would rest solely on the dubious claim that separate but equal is acceptable if the separated agree? Really?<\/p>\n When I was young I was tracked (with excellent results) but I was also required to take a half a dozen different shop classes (where many of my academic peers were far from performance leaders). This had a counterbalancing effect to the academic tracking, and promoted the mixing of all students in the school. As a teacher I was able to help coach a US FIRST Robotics Team that likewise included a broad range of students, and it was this breadth that was the aspect of the team most celebrated by the team members.<\/p>\n Slowly but surely though, financial pressure has been brought to bear to move “non-academic” “career-oriented” students to programs focused on “getting them a job”. I think one of the worst aspects of such programs is that it gives up on these students when these students have yet to demonstrate that they are literate.\u00a0 That is on its face unacceptable.\u00a0 What we see in test after test is that we are graduating students who have NOT mastered the adopted curriculum. To essentially accept that has an acceptable “truth” and thereupon to decide that we can then spend a couple of years not teaching them to read, but teaching them to do medical filing, is obscene.<\/p>\n But more importantly, and why I write today, such “vocational” schools promote class segregation at a time when such polarization is perhaps the biggest crisis facing this nation. Nor do the inclusion of a few well chosen “academic courses” remove the separate identity (whether one wants to call it stigmatization or not) as the students are still segregated.\u00a0 And see Cain Polidano and Domenico Tabasso, \u201cFully Integrating Upper-Secondary Vocational and Academic Courses: A Flexible New Way?,\u201d Economics of Education Review<\/i> 55 (December 1, 2016): 117\u2013131, accessed January 10, 2018, http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0272775716300012<\/a>; John H Bishop and Ferran Mane, \u201cThe Impacts of Career-Technical Education on High School Labor Market Success,\u201d Economics of Education Review<\/i> 23, no. 4, Special Issue In Honor of Lewis C. Solman (August 1, 2004): 381\u2013402, accessed January 10, 2018, http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0272775704000287<\/a>. And we have yet to address the gender segregation that is typical of Voc-Ed, VET, and\/or CTE programs<\/p>\n In creating “vocational schools” we are promoting the “deplorable”, if you will, as a viable segment of our population, and frankly, I don’t think pride in ignorance is anything to ever be proud of.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The highest court of this land, in the words of Chief Justice Warren, stated in no uncertain terms: “We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":714,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,13,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education","category-marc-grober","category-social-welfare"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/opinion.alaskapolicy.net\/pardonme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1023","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/opinion.alaskapolicy.net\/pardonme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/opinion.alaskapolicy.net\/pardonme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opinion.alaskapolicy.net\/pardonme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/714"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opinion.alaskapolicy.net\/pardonme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1023"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/opinion.alaskapolicy.net\/pardonme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1023\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1027,"href":"https:\/\/opinion.alaskapolicy.net\/pardonme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1023\/revisions\/1027"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/opinion.alaskapolicy.net\/pardonme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opinion.alaskapolicy.net\/pardonme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opinion.alaskapolicy.net\/pardonme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/opinion.alaskapolicy.net\/pardonme\/wp-content\/uploads\/blind-justice-peeking.jpg\")
rtial reversal of Rowley<\/em>, it was applied in Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE\u20131<\/em>, 580 U.S. ____ (2017).\u00a0 You cannot have equality of education where you are segregating populations, and that applies to the entire gamut of actual (or perceived) differences.<\/p>\n